Ty Watches "Shredder Orpheus"

Last night my buddy Kirk and I went to the Arkadin for Strange Brew night. Strange Brew night is a theme night where some weird, bottom of the bin type cult movies are shown. And when I saw "bottom of the bin", I mean hidden gems. These movies are delightfully weird and low budget and perfect for a spot like the Arkadin. Last night's selection was a skateboarding movie from 1990 called "Shredder Orpheus".

The host opened by telling us a few things about the movie, and then we were on our way. "Shredder Orpheus" was low budget, featured no big time stars, was clearly made amongst friends and it was gloriously ridiculous. I was pretty much all in from the jump. "Shredder Orpheus" takes place in a post-apocalyptic world where television runs society. We have the EBN, Euthanasia Broadcasting Network, who kind of runs the world now. They try to control all the viewers and they want everyone to become zombies basically. We also have the people who live in the Gray Zone. These are the gutter punks and people who tend to do their own thing. They don't conform to modern society and they're happy about it. This is where we meet Scratch, a young kid and a former soldier, the narrator of the movie. We see the movie through their eyes at the start. The world is bad. It is gross. There's nothing to really do besides skate and play music. Scratch and the young kid are pretty good on their boards. And Scratch is one hell of a percussion player. Scratch does play the "drums" on old oil drums, but it still sounds pretty solid.

After a little backstory, we finally get introduced to Orpheus. He is the frontman of his band, The Shredders. I do want to say, I really dug the music in this movie. The music was described online as punk, but I got much more of a prog/alternative rock vibe. The guitar was rad. The drums too. I wasn't too keen on the singing, but I couldn't really hear any lyrics anyway. But the music is besides the point. Orpheus is in love with a dancer named Eurydice, and they do eventually get married. At the party after the ceremony, Eurydice is killed by some bad dudes in all white makeup. Now, some of you may be thinking that this story sounds familiar, and you're right. This is the filmmakers take on the Greek Tragedy about Orpheus. I did not know this was the case until Kirk told me before the movie. I think they did an okay enough job telling this story too. Anyway, after Eurydice dies, the movie follows the Greek Tragedy pretty well, with its own twists. The skateboarding was pretty cool in the movie when they did show it. That was my biggest critique of the movie, I wanted more skateboarding. But, when skateboarding was onscreen, it was cool. I also thought the portrayals of the Greek figures were solid. Hades and Persphonne were so odd and so wild and I really enjoyed their crazy execution onscreen. The females who couldn't believe Orpheus didn't love them were terrifying and nuts. Cerberus was horrifying and I liked that he was an elevator attendant. Orpheus' parents were solid comic relief. The people who worked for the EBN really gave it their all. But, for me, Orpheus' manager was far and away the best. He was odd, funny, loud, boisterous and made the most sense of anyone speaking in the movie. It wasn't a total surprise to me when I looked him up and saw that he has been steadily working ever since this movie, appearing in a single episode of many procedurals.

Finally, when I really thought about it, when Kirk and I talked about it afterward, this was the exact type of movie I want to see when going to the Arkadin on Strange Brew night. The host was awesome. The crowd was perfect. The setting was ideal. And now I'm going to search out more and more movies of this ilk. I really enjoy these oddities and I'm stoked to have a friend and a place to go watch this stuff. And of course I recommend seeing "Shredder Orpheus" if you can get your hands on it, or if a cool indie theater near you shows it. It has to be seen to be believed. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

I Watched "The Apple"

Over the weekend I was finally able to watch "The Apple".

As many readers of the site already know, RD is a fan of this movie. Well, maybe not a fan so much as just interested in this weird and wild idea of this movie. I had never watched it before, but believe me, RD has let me know more than my fair share of what this movie is all about, on and off the screen. He has let others know about it as well I have to assume. But, he rented out a theater for a party and the invited guests, yours truly included on that list, got to watch it on the big screen, and I have some takes to get out in the ether. RD started off by giving us all a little presentation prior to the start of the movie about the plot and its personal meeting to him. Then we were off.

First and foremost, "The Apple" is a bad movie. I think that is the agreed upon review by the masses. The movie is nonsense. The musical numbers are long and can get boring quickly. The acting is subpar at best. The writing, and even more so, the direction is truly, truly awful. For a movie who's runtime is less than 90 minutes, it felt like it was dragging for a good portion during the middle. It is kind of a slog. I just needed to get that out there. This is unequivocally a bad movie. But, I learned a few things during our screening. I think I get what RD sees in this movie that he was trying to show us.

RD went to school for theater. He has a background in stage work. He knows that world better than I ever could imagine knowing it. I now see why he has a certain affinity for this movie. The sheer audacity of the filmmakers is right up there on the screen. The dancing numbers, while long, are not too bad. Some of the songs in the movie are rad. But, in RD's eyes, it makes sense why he watches it for the direction and the set up and how they tell their story. I could hear him on Sunday talking to his buddy about the stuff on screen, and their conversation flew over my head.

I also get why this movie has achieved its cult status. I'm a humongous fan of the Tommy Wiseau movie "The Room". That has a fanbase that is so unique and rabid towards the terribleness of that movie. I can see the same thing with "The Apple". I have to imagine that musical theater kids have a weird love for this movie. I can see people recreating it or acting it out amongst friends. The vibrant colors and big set pieces are more than enough to gain a fanbase from theater kids in my opinion. So, when my kid asked me the other night "how was the movie?". That was difficult to answer at first. But then I thought about the stuff I'm writing today and I told him that I was glad to see it, but it was a bad movie. I told him I was happy to see this movie that his uncle had been telling me about for years. I finally understood, at least a little bit, why he views this movie the way he does.

So, while "The Apple" is bad through and through, I get why Rd likes it and I understand the cult status this movie has built up over the years. Watch it if you'd like. It sure is a spectacle to see. 

Want to hear more about “The Apple”. Listen to this podcast

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Better Late than Never on "Run Lola Run"

I recently joined Letterboxd. I like the app. It is good because I can search a bunch of different posts and find movies I want to see but haven't yet. My watchlist is full of movies that I have wanted to watch and other movies that haven't come out yet. The majority of the movies I want to watch are older ones that have passed me by. There are a ton of older movies that, now that I'm older, I want to see. I have never seen a Kirosawa movie. There are a ton of Scorcese movies I've never watched due to my dislike of the movies of his I have seen. There are movies my brothers have talked about for years that I have never gotten around to. I decided to rectify that last weekend. One movie that kept popping up was "Run Lola Run".

I have heard about this movie for years. I believe RD used to talk about it a lot back in the day. I have seen "The Simpsons" episode that is a full parody of the movie. I have seen other people parody it as well. I always knew that it was about a woman running and trying to beat some kind of clock. But I have never watched it from start to finish. That all changed last Friday.

From the first shot, I was all in. This movie is totally awesome. It is one of the coolest things I've seen in a long, long time. For those that may not know, "Run Lola Run" is told in three different parts. The first is through Lola's eyes, the second is through her boyfriend's eyes, Manni, and the third is, spoiler alert, if they both made the right decision in this messed up situation. I liked every single part of this movie. The actor who played Lola was magnificent. She is so good, she owns every single moment she is on screen and, from what I read, the amount of running she was doing and how fast she was going, was a herculean task. I read that she insisted on wearing the Doc Martens her character wore. I also read that she smoked two packs a day. It doesn't show. It was rad to see. I also liked Manni. He did great work with just his face. He acted the hell out of this role, and he didn't have to say too much. What I liked most about this movie was the fate of the "common people" that Lola and Manni would run into. Another thing I liked how the movie would do almost a Polaroid picture break, and then give us some more Polaroids of what happened to these people in each scenario. It was very interesting, and had to be a new technique at the time. I also liked how the movie would switch from animation to real life. It was cool to see, and again, it had to be one of the first movies to do this. I also thought that the throughline story was pretty great. We get to see three different outcomes, and each has their own way to show what could happen. The first two are tragic, and the third is oddly comforting.

If you have never seen "Run Lola Run" I cannot recommend it enough. I'm so happy that I finally saw it myself. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Better Late Than Never on "Top Secret"

Last Friday I went to The Arkadin to see "Top Secret". I have always wanted to see this movie, but for a myriad of reasons, I let it slip my mind. I was listening to "Scott Hasn't Seen" recently and they did the movie. I don't remember which host, Scott Aukerman or Shaun Diston, hadn't seen it yet, but then I listened to the episode and it reminded me how much I wanted to see "Top Secret". And it helped that The Arkadin is doing a month long tribute to Val Kilmer and his many wonderful movies. I believe they are showing his "Batman" this week.

Anyway, as I settled into a full theater, I was very excited to watch the movie, and it did not disappoint. I really like "Naked Gun" and other spoof movies. They were showing episodes of "Police Squad" beforehand, and those were hilarious as well. I'm a spoof show/movie fan, so "Top Secret" is right up my alley. I was immediately struck at how old Val Kilmer was when he made this movie. "Top Secret" came out in 1984, so Kilmer was a baby, and looked the part. I believe this is one of his first starring roles, and you can see that he has that "it" factor that big Hollywood studios crave. He owned every single moment he was on screen. You cannot take your eyes off him. And he is on screen the vast majority of this movie. He is funny throughout the whole thing. He dances and sings like a damn angel. He has great chemistry with all of his co-stars, but especially the female lead. I especially loved the concert scene when he gets let out of jail to perform. This is a perfect send up of all the movies Elvis Presley movies from the 50's. They also added a Beatles element, with all the fans losing their minds, and it was hilarious. I was laughing very hard during this scene. I also loved that every time he played the guitar during the movie, he was always playing a G chord, but the music in the background was far more complex. But the thing that got me most was how funny Val Kilmer was, and he was ostensibly the straight man throughout the movie. The sheer fact that he was able to keep a straight face while delivering some of his wonderfully funny lines is amazing to me. Seeing him do this, and control the movie the way he did, hammered home the fact that I could never be an actor. But, after seeing Kilmer do work here, not too many people could pull off what he did in "Top Secret". It is no surprise that Kilmer went on to star in so many big time movies after this. This was his jumping off point and he totally nailed it. During the "Scott Hasn't Seen" episode they kept mentioning this same thing, but I needed to see it for myself, and I'm stoked that I did.

"Top Secret" is a very funny spoof movie, but Val Kilmer's performance puts this movie over the top for me. I have been thinking back to stuff I liked in the movie and just laughing to myself since Friday. I highly recommend checking out "Top Secret" if you haven't yet. Val Kilmer is incredible and the movie is a ton of fun. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Go Discover the Films of Quentin Dupieux

Ever since meeting my buddy he has told me about cool pop culture stuff that I have missed. From punk rock to tv shows to movies, he has given me some great recommendations. When our friendship first started over a decade ago we found common ground in movies.

Before we met I had seen the movie "Rubber". For those that may not know, the short version of the movie is, a tire becomes sentient and starts to take matters into its own hands. "Rubber" is insane, nonsensical, hilarious and I really liked it. I mentioned that I liked this movie early on in our friendship. Well, since then, my buddy has opened my eyes to the wonderful world of Quentin Dupieux.

Dupieux is a French filmmaker, but he isn't your typical filmmaker. His movies are nuts. They go in so many different directions. I never know what I'm going to get in when I turn one of his movies on, but I have found that they always keep my attention. I saw "Rubber" because I had heard about this movie with a sentient tire and John Malkovich was in the cast. That was all I needed. And, as I said, I really liked it. But I didn't think about it much afterward. I saw it, enjoyed it and moved on. I didn't go out of my way to learn much else about the movie or the people involved. But after talking about it with my friend, and then having many more conversations, I have watched more of Dupieux's stuff. I recently wrote about the movie "Deerskin". This was another one that was intense and weird and funny and I liked it.

We were recently talking about absurd comedy and he brought up another Dupieux movie, "Wrong". I watched it just the other day and I haven't stopped thinking about it since. I have a plan now to watch every Dupieux movie I can during the summer and into the next school year. I can't shake movies like "Wrong" or "Deerskin". I have thought much more about "Rubber" than ever before. I keep seeing other movies of his on my streaming channels of choice and cannot wait to dive in.

Why do I want to watch these movies that can be challenging and different you may be asking? Because Dupieux is doing something different. He is taking chances. He makes movies that you have to pay attention to because if you don't, you'll miss key elements. I like movies that make me think. I want to see something unique. I want to see something that is a fresh and cool new idea. We are so bogged down with remakes and superhero stuff now. That's what makes a movie like "Sinners" or "Everything Everywhere All at Once" or Quentin Dupieux movies so enticing for me. These movies aren't remakes. These aren't superhero retreads. These are new and fresh ideas. The movies go off in crazy directions and that is so awesome and a breath of fresh air. I like directors and writers that are willing to take it to the edge, and sometimes jump off that edge. It rules.

I cannot recommend Dupieux's work enough. You need to be prepared for what is ahead, and understand that what you're about to watch is not "normal". But if you do, you will be rewarded with some of the most original content you will ever watch. I'm forever grateful to my buddy for opening my eyes to this world. I hope I can return the favor to him in some way. Until then, I am stoked to talk more Quentin Dupieux movies with him. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches "Sinners"

My wife and I saw "Sinners" last Friday. I had read nothing but glowing reviews for the movie, and then RD texted me and told me it was a great movie. I trust RD's opinion on movies. He has never really steered me wrong. And the 98 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes was all I pretty much needed to see this movie. I also saw a preview for it when my dad and I watched "Mickey 17".

As we settled into the theater, which was about 90 percent full, my expectations were pretty high. And this movie more than lived up to the hype. I loved everything about "Sinners". The movie was stylish and cool. I liked the old school vibe of the movie.

“Sinners” takes place in the early 1930's in Mississippi. Michael B Jordan plays dual roles, and from the moment he was on screen, the very first shot, I couldn't take my eyes off what he was doing. Michael B Jordan has become one of the most reliable actors in all of Hollywood. And when he and Ryan Coogler team up, that is a match made in heaven. Coogler and Michael B Jordan made magic together in "Fruitvale Station", "Black Panther" and "Creed". They have now done the same with "Sinners". This is one of the coolest and most unique movies that has come out since "Everything Everywhere All at Once". It may seem like a rehashed vampire movie, but it is so much more than that and so much better than that and so much cooler than that.

The movie has a slow burn to it for the first hour, where they're, for all intents and purposes, "getting the band together". We learn a whole lot more about the two characters Michael B Jordan is playing. One is a hustler and one is no nonsense. They get all the people they want to help them out, and they head out on their way. During this first hour we also see the town they grew up in and returned to, the people they have interacted with and it seems like something sinister is lurking underneath. We then see a man on fire enter on screen, and this is where the movie goes from great to classic. This is where the vampire portion of the movie comes into play. But the vampires represent so much more in this world. And at times I actually side with the vampires. The main vampire is talking about community and acceptance and it is damn enticing and moving. But the main characters that fight them are on the good side, and eventually you have to accept and agree with them. They have the best interest of the community.

Throughout all of this we get some excellent, all timer scenes in this movie. I love the driving on dirt roads we see a lot of in the beginning. The old school church is haunting and interesting. The dance sequence the vampires do was frightening and fascinating. But, the scene that will be remembered for all time was the music scene with Preacher Boy playing guitar and singing an old blues classic. During the song we see music from all genres and all eras. It makes for one of the best and most unique scenes in the history of film. It was amazing to see all this different music come together while Preacher Boy absolutely nails the song. I think about this one scene multiple times a day.

"Sinners" is making a ton at the movies, which is well deserved. "Sinners" also definitely earned all of the positive reviews. I highly recommend this movie to everyone. It is wonderful and one of the fresher ideas in Hollywood. Check it out. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Better Never than Late on "Kraven the Hunter"

I tend to enjoy movies that focus on antiheroes. I like these for some reason. Maybe it is the origin of how they came to be antiheroes or villains. Maybe it is the fact that these movies are a little more adult. Maybe I just enjoy a downer of a story. Anyway, with the influx of so many superhero movies, I tend to veer towards the antihero stuff.

With this being said, I recently watched "Kraven the Hunter". I read all the bad reviews. I saw what people were saying. I saw how it came and went from the theaters in a matter of days. None of that stopped me. I decided I still wanted to see the movie. I also enjoy Aaron Taylor Johnson. He seems to be a solid actor and usually picks good roles. I thought of all of this and made the incorrect decision to watch this horrible movie.

That's the honest truth. The critics, my friends and the movie theaters were all right. This movie was very, very, very bad. I wish I had listened to everyone else on this one. From the start I should have known. This movie was so boring. The whole idea of going back to when they were kids did not work for me. It was cliche after cliche. I get it, your dad is a bad guy. He's a drug dealer. He did shady stuff to your mom. He is a villain. But they just kept hammering it home. That was the first hour of the movie. I actually found myself dozing off. That shouldn't be the case for an antihero/action movie. I should never "rest my eyes" during a movie like this. They also take their best actor, Taylor Johnson, off screen the whole time. This movie is slightly over two hours long, and the main character is not even in the first hour. We don't see "Kraven", we get Sergei, who is boring as hell. And when we do get Kraven, it isn't much more fun. Sure, there's a few okay enough fight scenes, but they didn't last that long. They had this great setup with Kraven's brother being kidnapped, but it looked like the same scene being used over and over again. Taylor Johnson couldn't keep an accent that he wanted to use throughout the movie. At times he was a New Yorker. At others, he was English. And I think I even heard a bit of an Australian voice in there. His brother's voice was American when he was an adult, but Russian when he was a kid. Russell Crowe kept the Russian accent throughout, but Russell Crowe is a reliable actor. The lady that played Calypso had an American accent the whole time, but she acted like she didn't want to be in this movie at all. You could tell she knew this was a pile of trash.

I think the thing that made me dislike this movie so much was the poor execution of what could have been a very cool story. This felt thrown together. It had a major pandemic feel to it. I should have suspected it was going to be bad due to the constant pushback of the release day. There were so many signs to this movie being bad but I ignored them all. I decided I had to watch and that was a bad choice on my end.

Don't watch this movie. It is bad. It's not fun bad either, it is just bad bad. Don't make the same mistake I did. Skip "Kraven the Hunter". You'll thank me later. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Better Late than Never on "Tenet"

After many years of wanting to see "Tenet", the time finally arrived this past Saturday. I've been taking my son to his uncle's house to watch what we consider good movies, and "Tenet" was the pick last week. I remember seeing the trailer prior to the pandemic. It helped that it was Christopher Nolan directing too, he is one of the best doing it right now. But, the pandemic happened, I wasn't willing to go to a theater, even if it was rented out, and then it kind of slipped my mind all together. It wasn't until our previous movie night that it was brought up and that stoked my interest once again.

We were all finally able to get together on Saturday, and as we sat down, I didn't really know what to expect, but I was excited. It also helped that we were told by the only person in the room to have seen the movie to not try and make it make sense. He let us know it was a movie about "vibes". He explained that if we let it wash over us, he thought we would enjoy it more. That was a great piece of advice. As the movie started, with the knowledge to just watch and enjoy, I found myself doing as such.

I liked the movie quite a bit. For all intents and purposes, "Tenet" is a spy thriller with beautiful people wearing nice clothes and doing kickass fight scenes. That was the best way to approach the whole movie. Sure, there is a story involved, and it helps to pay full attention, but if you look at it as a modern Bond movie, another bit of advice from our host, you can have a good time. John David Washington plays the lead role, he is credited as "Protagonist". He is wonderful in this movie. He looks sharp. He seems to be fully locked in and enjoying himself. He has some of the best fight scenes in the movie and he is our narrator all along the way. This felt like a big deal to him and it shows on screen. Robert Pattinson is in and out of the movie, but his role is way more important than his screen time lets on. He is integral, he is also sharply dressed, he gets to play aloof, but you know he has a lot going on. I become even more of a fan of his with each cool and unique role he takes in movies. The dude can act. Kenneth Branagh is the villain, and he is about as villainous as you can be. He is mean and egotistical and yells a ton. But it's this well seasoned, well renowned actor doing it, so the role is done better than most. Elizabeth Debicki is the "damsel in distress" in this movie, but she also gets to do some very cool stuff, and she gets to take out the worst of them all in a very satisfying manner. And we also get to see Himesh Patel, Michael Caine and Martin Donovan show up on screen for a scene or two, and they make the most of their time.

The casting is great. The set pieces are beautiful to look at in this movie. The action sequences are incredible and Nolan continues to prove that he does action better than almost any other director out there. The clothes and people are also insanely good looking. This is a cool, fun and interesting movie. I will recommend the whole idea of this being a vibes movie and watching it like it's an updated Bond movie without James Bond. I recommend this movie and I think you will find it pretty damn cool if you do watch. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches "Saturday Night"

During last week and so far this week I have been catching up on some movies that I've been putting off. One such movie is "Saturday Night".

A good amount of people whose opinion I appreciate, told me to watch this movie. I used to watch "SNL" a ton back in the late 90's and early 2000's. I watched all the way through The Lonely Island's run, but then I kind of fell off. During that time I went back and watched older episodes. I decided I wanted to watch episodes from the 70's and 80's. I kind of fell in love with the earliest episodes during that time. I got way more into the minutiae of comedy at that time, so learning about some of the earliest writers rooms, reading and educating myself on people like Micahel O'Donoghue and Rosie Schuster was a total blast for me. So, when the people that recommended the movie told me it was about the first live airing of "SNL", that was all I needed to know to watch. Other stuff came up, but I was finally able to watch it all in one sitting yesterday. And I totally loved it.

I was all in on this movie from the first frame. I really enjoy movies that seem frenetic, especially when they take us back to a very important time in history. And let us not get it twisted, "SNL" changed the game when it comes to live sketch comedy. No other show in that genre would be here now if it weren't for "SNL". There would be no "Key and Peele", no "Chapelle Show", no "MadTV" without "SNL". This movie focused on the 90 minutes leading up to the first airing of the show. We got to see all the behind the scenes stuff. I really liked seeing how rough rehearsal could be. I liked watching the castmates cutting loose with one another. Seeing Lorne Michaels constantly on the move made for an intriguing story. Seeing old classic actors walking around trying to figure out what the show was going to be, and then dismissing it, that stuff moves me. I'm sure it is all made more grandiose for movies, but I don't really care. If a movie is well made, and "Saturday Night" most definitely is, I can overlook that stuff.

The casting here was amazing. I was shocked at how authentic they made it feel. Gabriel LaBelle, who I have never heard of, played Michaels. He was magnetic. He totally embodied everything that I have to imagine Michaels was going through that night. But he always stuck to his vision. The casting of the first cast was great too. Dylan O'Brien shined as Dan Akyroyd. He became him. Lamorne Morris brought brevity and hilarity to Garrett Morris. Ella Hunt brough the wit and constant upbeat attitude of Gilda Radner. Emily Fairn was so incredible as Larraine Newman. Her performance made me appreciate Newman's genius even more. Kim Matula embodied Jane Curtin and brought the feminist badass out in her. Matt Wood was quietly wonderful as John Belushi. And Cory Michael Smith brought out all of the asshole in Chevy Chase. Nicolaus Braun did double duty, nailing it as both Andy Kaufman and Jim Henson. I do want to shout out two other performers as well. I mentioned my fandom for O'Donoghue and Schuster earlier. Well, Tommy Dewey was absolutely perfect as O'Donoghue and Rachel Sennott continues to build her resume higher and higher with each role. She's awesome as Schuster. And Cooper Hoffman is wonderful as a young Dick Ebersol.

It was clear from watching how important "SNL" is to Jason Reitman. He directed this movie beautifully. It showed on screen. I highly recommend this movie for fans of "SNL" and sketch comedy in general. To see the start of it all was pretty great. Go watch this movie. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches "Mickey 17"

Last Friday my dad and I went to see "Mickey 17". I was going to write about it right after seeing it, a quick reaction, but I decided I wanted to sit on it and give the movie more thought. I wanted the weekend to sit with it. I'm glad I did.

Right off the bat, I really liked the movie. I'm a Bong Joon Ho fan. I love "Snowpiercer" and "Parasite". The love for those movies put me in a pretty good head space heading into "Mickey 17". What I enjoyed the most about "Mickey 17" was the humor. This is a funny movie. There's jokes and some of the things Robert Pattinson does as his version of each Mickey made me laugh out loud. Speaking of Pattinson, he is truly wonderful in the movie. He gets to do a ton and he nails it. With each new Mickey there are subtle changes and Pattinson brings all of them to life. The two main Mickey's, 17 and 18, are who we spend most of the time with and Pattinson plays both. Each Mickey is totally different and that is fully due to his performance. I thought he was amazing and he has become a better actor with each movie. He has upped his game, picks cool projects and I want to see what he is going to do next.

The other cast members are solid too. Naomi Ackie plays Nasha, Mickey's partner. She is badass and super cool. She knows this whole society they live in is nuts and she lets everyone know. She gives a great performance. Steven Yeun is Mickey's buddy, and he is an asshole. He is only out for himself. He will do anything to get ahead no matter who he has to screw over. Yeun is so reliable and so good as an actor and I am a fan. Mark Ruffalo is over the top in the best possible way. He is putting on a show as the villain and I grew to despise his character pretty quickly. I have to believe that was the point. He was so annoying and so stupid and Nasha lets him know it. Toni Collete plays his wife and she is equally despicable. She makes "sauces" and is always in her husband's ear. She is always telling him what to do in a way that will only benefit the two of them. And then we have the "creepers". These are the alien creatures that live on the planet they are travelling to in the movie, Nilfheim. They have a pretty great turn in the movie and it makes it all come together in the end.

Along with the acting, the story is great. This is clearly an allegory for how messed up the US is under this current "administration". Ho made his own version of it and set it in the near future. He kind of nailed it when it comes to what a trip on a spaceship away from a rotting Earth would feel like. It looked truly miserable. But Ho made it funny, made it work and made it a blast to watch. And I love the stuff he did with the "creepers".

This is a very good movie that I want more and more people to see. It is a fast two hour and seventeen minutes. And Pattinson is so good in his role. I highly recommend it. And go to a theater if you have the chance. The movie deserves to be seen on a big screen. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

R.I.P. David Johansen

I don't know how it passed me up on my social media timeline stuff, but I just saw that David Johansen passed away a few days ago. Let’s discuss.

Some people may not know who Johansen was, but I sure do. The people that do remember him probably know him from his band The New York Dolls. I never listened to his band. I think they were punk or maybe glam rock or something like that based on what they wore on stage. I will probably go check out some of the music now that Johansen is gone though. Other people may know him as an actor. Johansen was in a ton of stuff during his acting career. I saw him in a documentary about his solo music career very recently. I only saw the very end, but it was fascinating from what I saw. I will say though, he did look pretty sickly in the doc, and the movie finished filming right before COVID. But he was in plenty of things. He had a three episode arc on "Oz". He filmed a lot of stuff as his alter ego, Buster Poindexter. He appeared in a good amount of corny 90's comedies. And he played the bartender in "A Very Murray Christmas" on Netflix. But what I know him from best is as the Ghost of Christmas Past in my favorite holiday movie "Scrooged".

Johansen was so memorable in his small role to me. I have his face burned into my memory. He was the cab driver that was always smoking a big fat cigar. But he also made the most of his lines in the movie. The way he spoke was so memorable for me too. He was gruff and grimy. He had a brash New York accent. He had a raspy voice that always stuck with me. Of all the ghosts that Murray was visited by in the movie, Johnasen's was my favorite part. He made the gloomy parts gloomier in a good way. He showed Murray's character how bad his life was in the past, and that was essential to the plot of this movie. He took the limited screen time he had and ran with it. From that point on, anytime I saw David Johnasen in anything else I pigeonholed him as his character from "Scrooged". That's on me doing that, but I don't necessarily think that is such a bad thing. Johnasen left such an indelible impression on me with that one role that it has stuck with me even to this day. I adore his performance in that movie and will always adore that performance.

It was kind of nice to see a bunch of people, when I caught up on social media, paying tribute to Johnasen. He clearly left a mark on a ton of people in both the musical and acting world. He also seemed to have a ton of friends all over the world. A musician I really like, Black Joe Lewis, even paid a very nice tribute to him on his Instagram page. David Johansen seemed like a guy who lived his life to the fullest. It seemed like he tried to do as much as he could while he was on Earth. I appreciate that.

Rest in Peace David Johansen/Buster Poindexter/The Ghost of Christmas Past. I hope you're having fun wherever you may be right now. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Thoughts on the Oscars

I don't watch the Oscars. I have never really watched the broadcast. It may have been on in the house when I was a kid because I know my mom likes that stuff. But, for me, I have always just checked who won the next day. And I used to have a ton of takes. I would gripe to anyone who would listen. I did this for a while too. I'm sure I was pretty annoying to whoever would listen to me. I felt that I knew better about movies than others, I'd voice that opinion, and other people would move on. I wouldn't. I'd keep it going. Then, when I started dating my wife in my mid 20's, she really didn't care too much about the Oscars. And because I liked her, I kind of stopped talking about it all together. I'd still check to see the list of winners, but I would just move on. Sometimes movies I liked won, most of the time, movies I hadn't even seen at that moment won. That's the way this stuff is.

Last night was pretty weird and made me truly realize how insufferable I had to be back in the day. "Anora" took home pretty much all of the big awards. I'm currently 40 minutes into that movie, with an eye on finishing it today. I think it is a pretty good movie with an incredible performance from Mikey Madison. I feel like she is a deserving best actress winner. But, on the internet you would have thought a catastrophe occurred when Madison was announced the winner. Apparently a lot of people thought Demi Moore should have won for "The Substance". I love "The Substance". I personally think it was the best movie of 2024 by a wide margin, and Moore was exceptional in the movie. But, people on Instagram and other social media sites were screaming and yelling and viscerally angry that Moore was beat out by Madison. People went so far as to compare this to the plot of "The Substance". I don't buy into any of that at all.

The Oscars are subjective. Both actresses put on wonderful performances and were both deserving of the award. But only one person can bring the trophy home. They don't give out half trophies. I saw a lot of people were upset that Adrien Brody won his second Oscar. I have not seen "The Brutalist" yet, I plan on seeing it, but people seem angry. I guess he tossed his gum at his girlfriend and his acceptance speech went on forever which also upset people. I'm not a fan of Brody's. I have never been a fan. And the speech and tossing of gum is not a surprise to me, which is part of the problem. But, by all accounts, he did a good job in a movie that is solely focused on his character. And all the lead up talk I read was about him being the front runner. While I don't like him, it seemed like he was going to win it all along.

I don't plan on watching "Emilia Perez", I've heard it is quite bad, but no one seemed as angry about Zoe Saldana, a fantastic actress, winning for that movie as they did, and do about Madison and Brody winning. Everyone I have heard talk about "Emilia Perez" says it is very bad, and we now have all this controversy surrounding the titular character in the movie. Kieran Culkin was incredible in "A Real Pain", but I have even seen some gripe about his win.

Not one of these actors and actresses got full acceptance from anyone. Some people simply want to complain no matter what the outcome may be. People feel this weird need to go online and instantly give their reaction and thoughts about a subjective thing that doesn't even matter in the long run.

I guess what I want to say today to the reader, and anyone who had to suffer through my nonsense back then, I'm sorry and it's not that important. In the long run it doesn't really matter who wins an Oscar because we can all go back and watch the movies we all like and relive the performances we all enjoy. We don't have to degrade anyone else or any performance that we may not have been that high on at the time. All these award shows are meant to force debate, but if we just took a step back and let it go, maybe things would be easier to deal with in the long run. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

A Millennial Remembers Gene Hackman

Gene Hackman, his wife and their dog all passed away two days ago. There has been a lot of speculation about the passing, but the reality is the world lost an all time actor. I hope they get this all figured out, but in the end, they have gone to the other side.

I was a fan of Gene Hackman's acting. He was a winning actor for sure. He, for the most part, took on pretty cool roles and, more likely than not, nailed it. I'm a big time sports fan, as you all know, so my social media feed was filled with everything "Hoosiers". I don't particularly care for that movie. I find it a little boring. I get all the love for it, and what it did for sports movies, but give me "Major League", "Bull Durham", "White Men Can't Jump" and "Hoop Dreams" anyday over "Hoosiers". I did also get a lot of love for "The French Connection". I have never seen that movie. I have heard it has one of the best car chase scenes ever filmed. And Hackman won one of his two Oscars for that movie.

For me there are two movies that told me everything I needed to know to be a fan of Hackman's work. The first is a pretty bad movie, which I love, called "The Replacements". This movie is about replacement football players that take over for the original players that are on strike. The whole idea of this movie is a problem up front. The viewer is supposed to be rooting for "scabs". These guys aren't pros, the pros are asking for more money, which they deserve. But, we are told that the pros are the bad guys and the replacements are the good guys. Anyway, this movie is all about Keanu Reeves' relationship with the cheerleader he likes, and his new coach, played by Gene Hackman. What makes me like this movie is Hackman's performance. He brings a gravitas and classic acting style to this movie. Hackman could have phoned it in and just cashed a check. He didn't do that though. He fully bought in. He was an old school coach put into a rough situation. Hackman wore a fedora, had a salt and pepper mustache and carried this aura of "win one more game for your old ball coach". And I loved it. I bought every single second of his performance in this cliched, tired sports movie. He was the best part about it, and when I first watched it, I had no idea he was even in the movie. The fact that I even remember a thing about this movie is because of Hackman.

The other movie, playing one of the greatest roles of all time as Royal Tenenbaum, is "The Royal Tenenbaums". This is my favorite Wes Anderson movie. I believe it is his best. The cast is amazing. The story is so well told. All of the actors are giving it one million percent and totally nailing it. This isn't just a straight forward comedy from Anderson. He tries new stuff out and he crushes it. But, the best person in this movie filled with magnetic performances is Hackman as the patriarch of the family. He's mean and gritty. He only cares about himself all the way to the end. He only wants things that will further push his wants and needs. He is an asshole, an egomaniac and a terrible father. And you cannot take your eyes off him whenever he is on screen. He owns the room every time he's in a scene. He is the funniest one in the movie. The moments of clarity he has are always undercut by more of his character's poor attitude and nonsense. I was blown away the first time I saw him in this, and with every rewatch, it reminds me of how amazing Hackman was in this movie. I've read that he was kind of a jerk to Anderson on set, and that is a bummer. But this is a role that will forever define Hackman's career for me. As a viewer of the movie of his I've seen, this is the best he's ever done and it's one of the best performances of all time. We should all be very grateful that we get to watch him as Royal Tenenbaum.

Rest in Peace to Gene Hackman, his wife and his dog. Time will tell how it all went down. But, enjoy being one of the greatest actors wherever you may be right now. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Better Never Than Late on "Venom: The Last Dance"

My wife and I watched "Venom: The Last Dance" over the weekend.

Oh boy.

A while back I wrote about how I enjoyed the first movie in the Tom Hardy "Venom" universe. That movie understood what it was supposed to be. It was silly. The relationship between Eddie Brock and Venom was one of the better love stories I've seen in a long time. The action sequences weren't great, but they were fun because everyone involved was in on the joke. I kept watching it and saying that I didn't know why, but I liked the movie. We watched the first movie again when we were in Mexico a few months ago, and it was then when it dawned on me that the first "Venom" movie is a perfect, lazy day on vacation movie. It lives in the background, you check it out for a minute or two and then you go back to relaxing. We did watch the second movie, but that one was too violent and too scary. They went for as much gore as a PG-13 movie could go for. The Eddie Brock and Venom duo wasn't as great, they wasted Woody Harrelson and the stuff with Michelle Williams just didn't hit. I was kind of bummed afterward because they went in a totally different direction. It had the opposite effect that the "Thor" movies had. Those movies shifted to more comedy where this movie shifted to violence.

But, with the third installment being called "The Last Dance", it piqued my interest. I was hoping that they'd go back to trying comedy and focusing a bit more on Brock and Venom. Well, this movie took a third tonal shift, and for me, it fell flat. This time they tried to go sentimental. This, for me, is not what this story should be. I wished they'd gone back to having fun and goofing around. I thought they would go for broke and make joke after joke after joke. They did not. I will say, they definitely spent more time on Brock and Venom's relationship. Those two were talking back and forth the entire time they were on screen. They worked on their relationship so much that they ended the movie with a montage from the previous movies. But, the way they spoke to one another was corny as hell. There was one scene where Venom turned into a horse, made Eddie ride him, and as they were going faster and faster, Venom said, "now that's what I call horsepower". That is some low level writing in my opinion. And this continued time and again. They got big name actors and barely used them. Juno Temple is onscreen for maybe five minutes. Chiwetel Ejiofor is there for a little longer, maybe ten minutes, and he is a cliched former army veteran. Rhys Ifans plays a hippy and it is not so great. They got all these great British actors to play Americans, and while they could've made jokes about that, they chose not to, which bummed me out. The action sequences were dull and boring. You get so many symbiotes in this movie, which should have been awesome, and they came and went far too fast. And the final scene between Venom and Eddie Brock, where they really tried to tug at the heartstrings, was not very good. You could see where it was going from the start, and to have one of them sacrifice themselves, I was not a fan.

I guess I'm happy that I get to watch the first one anytime I want. That movie will hold a special place for me. But I wish the people involved stuck with the goofiness. Three genre changes just simply didn't work. Maybe Tom Hardy had enough and was ready to be done with this role. I don't know, but "The Last Dance" was not as good as it could have been for me. Oh well. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

James Mangold Makes Movies for All the Adults in a Family to Enjoy

Earlier today I heard a comedy writer I like say something that I found to be pretty profound. He and one of his other podcast hosts were talking about "A Complete Unknown". Sean Clements said he liked it, and then he dropped one of the better quotes I've ever heard. He said some form of, "I hope James Mangold continues to make movies that me and my folks like". I couldn't agree more.

I also recently saw "A Complete Unknown", with my mom I might add, and I liked it quite a bit. You can go read my blog about the movie on the site. My mom loved it too. When we drove home we talked about all the things we liked about the movie. My biggest takeaway was the direction. The movie had a nice flow, the music scenes were shot beautifully and the actors seemed to understand the assignment. I credit a good portion of all of this to the director.

After hearing Clements comment, and thinking about my personal experience with "A Complete Unknown", it got me thinking. Now, my favorite Mangold movie is "Logan". This is not one for my mom, but my dad may like it if he ever watched it. I think it is the best version of how brutal and violent a mutant like Wolverine can be. I also think the idea of making more of these mutants in a lab and how rough and wrong that is was a nice touch. He also gets a tremendous performance from Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart. Those two are dynamic actors, but he got the best out of them. But the performance he pulled from Stephen Merchant was a stroke of genius. I only knew Merchant from comedy movies and shows, but he pulled off one of the better dramatic performances I've seen. It was a masterful job from Mangold getting that out of Merchant.

I did some more diving into his movies this afternoon, I found even more movies that fit into the genre of me and my folks having a good time. "Ford Vs Ferrari" has no right being as entertaining as it is. I had zero expectations going into that movie and it was great. "Walk the Line" kind of started the resurgence in these movie biopics. That is a Mangold directed movie as well. He got Oscar worthy performances out of Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon. He helped those two become even bigger stars. Phoenix became Johnny Cash. Reese Witherspoon was dynamic as June Carter. That movie is special and important to many, many people. Hell, without "Walk the Line" we would have never gotten "Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story". Mangold also directed "The Wolverine". This was the follow up to "X-Men Origins: Wolverine". "The Wolverine" was going to be better no matter what, but it actually revitalized that character in my opinion. "Knight and Day" is a fun movie with star power. Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz have wonderful chemistry and they make this formulaic movie kind of worth watching. And the remake of "3:10 to Yuma" is a great action western. That movie made me want to watch some older westerns because of how much I liked it.

The one thing that all these movies have in common with my liking of them, the ones my folks have seen seem to enjoy them as well. James Mangold makes non threatening movies that the whole family will enjoy. The cliche works here and works like a charm. I'm curious to see what Mangold does next, but whatever it may be, I bet my folks and I will really enjoy talking about it afterwards. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Seek Out and Watch "Wyrm"

I recently finished a movie that caught my attention simply due to the poster. While looking at streaming services for a movie to watch, I came across this movie called "Wyrm" on plex. The poster is a younger kid with a 90's background, akin to a JC Penny photo shoot, and after the title of the movie, the tagline reads, "simply looking for love". This was all I really needed. It had the odd vibe that I enjoy in indie movies and I was all in. After my buddy explained it a bit to me, that gave me the final push I needed.

Right off the bat, I really enjoyed this movie. It was weird and simplistic, in the best ways. It was funny and surprisingly heartfelt. The performances were pretty damn impressive. As I was watching the movie, I got vibes of "Napoleon Dynamite" and "Welcome to the Dollhouse". The movie, in its lead roles, has smaller name actors that I hadn't heard of. When you look at the cast in the opening credits there are recognizable names, but those actors play small roles. Names like Rhea Seehorn, Paula Pell, Jenna Ortega, Lukas Gage, Natasha Rothwell, Rosemarie DeWitt and Dan Bakedahl pepper the cast. But the lead roles are from Theo Taplitz, as Wyrm, Lulu Wilson, as Izzy, Sosie Bacon, as Lindsay and Azure Brandi, as Myrcella. These actors are tremendous in this movie. Azure Brandi plays Wyrm's sister, and she is mean and bossy and loving in her role. Sosie Bacon is terrific as the other person in the car accident that led to Myrcella and Wyrm's brother's death. Lulu Wilson is weird and wonderful as Izzy. She has two dance sequences that are rad. And Taplitz absolutely steals the show as the title character. He is mousey and quiet. He is your typical introvert. He is a quieter Napoleon Dynamite. He has more feelings that he's struggling to deal with as a young teen. Taplitz was a revelation to me, and I will be looking to see more of his work.

The movie's plot is an interesting one too. This movie takes place in an alternate reality in the 90's. Kids who have never been kissed wear a big collar around their necks. When they get that first kiss, their "collars pop". That leads to bracelets and other contraptions as you get older and experiment more. But this isn't a typical movie about young kids trying to "score". There's the death in the family. Wyrm and Myrcella's parents are dealing with grief in their own ways. The kids live with their uncle and his girlfriend. School is a whole other monster that they have to deal with, by which I am referring to the collars. Everyone is very straightforward and no nonsense. And while the first half has its funny moments and got some big laughs from me, the more they dive into the dramatic stuff, the more I liked this movie. As I said before, this movie has heart. This movie is telling a story. This movie is a true coming of age movie that we haven't seen in quite some time.

I highly recommend checking this movie out if you come across it somewhere. It's different and unique. While it may have vibes of other movies, this is its own telling of a funny and, at times, a very sad one. Go and watch this. You won't be disappointed. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches "A Complete Unknown"

Yesterday my mom and I went to see "A Complete Unknown". Let’s discuss.

I was a bit skeptical going into this movie. I usually enjoy music biopics, but when it's an artist that I like, I get a little hesitant. I have yet to see the Bob Marley fictional biopic "One Love". Marley is my favorite artist of all time, I have watched documentaries about him, I have dove about as deep as one can into his music catalog. He is too important to me to watch someone else play him. I know that I would be too hypercritical about a fictional movie centered around Bob Marley. And while I adore Bob Dylan, he is not on Marley's level for me. I've also kind of fallen off a bit from music biopics. I thought the Freddy Mercury movie with Rami Malek was bad. I have not seen "Rocketman", and don't know if I'll ever see it. I rewatched "Ray" during COVID and it didn't hold up for me like the first time I saw it. I am a snob about music, and when the story is fictional and given the Hollywood treatment, I tend to tune it out. But, with a push from my mom, and my newfound fandom of Timothee Chalamet, I decided to give this one a go.

I'm glad I did. I appreciate my mom urging me to go with her. I thought this movie was excellent. I should have known with James Mangold directing that the audience was in good hands. He did great with "Walk the Line" and "Logan" is my favorite "superhero" movie. He is a good director, and he knows how to shoot musicians. Chalamet is a revelation here. He could have made his version of Dylan a cliched impression. He could have just used a funny voice and kind of walked his way through this movie. He didn't do that. As my mom said, he embodied Dylan. He became him. From his look to his voice to even playing guitar and singing the songs himself, Chalamet absolutely knocked it out of the park.

My mom also said something else that really stood out to me after the movie too. She said that she could see Chalamet becoming a new age Humphrey Bogart or Cary Grant. This kid is hyper talented. He seems to pick good movies most of the time. I love his portrayal of Paul Atreideis in both new "Dune" movies. I thought he did a superb job as a young Willy Wonka in "Wonka". I like his stuff in movies like "Don't Look Up" and "Ladybird". And after seeing him play Dylan, he is now one of my favorite actors working today. And he definitely had help.

Scoot McNairy, as a sickly Woody Guthrie, helped move the story along. I thought Ed Norton did great things with his version of Pete Seeger. Elle Fanning was great as Dylen's first partner after he moved to NYC. Monica Barbaro was wonderful as Joan Baez. Boyd Holbrook was convincing as Johnny Cash. I mean, pretty much everyone in this movie seemed to understand the assignment and ran with it and did some great things.

I also liked that the story of the movie was Dylan's early rise to fame and him playing at the Newport Folk Festival up until he goes electric. And I thought the way they handled the whole ordeal of him going electric was perfect. This movie never got cliche and sappy. They showed Dylan's genius, but also how tough it would be to collaborate or be in a relationship with him. I felt bad for Pete Seeger after Dylan's rise to fame because he became a second hand person in his life.

I loved this movie. The reason to see this and watch it again and again is Chalamet's performance. He is dynamic and I hope he continues to do cool stuff in his acting career. He is a talented dude. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Bob Uecker Made My World a Better Place

Bob Uecker, the iconic voice of the Milwaukee Brewers and one of America’s most cherished entertainers, passed away today at the age of 90. Affectionately known as “Mr. Baseball,” Uecker was far more than a sports figure—he was a cultural icon whose humor, wit, and charm transcended the game. 

We already knew all of that.

Outside of Bob’s less than mediocre professional baseball career, his longtime duties as the voice of the Brewers, and his movie/television career, Mr. Baseball was someone who impacted my life in a very positive way. I already miss him dearly.

Bob Uecker has been a part of my life for as long as I can remember. His Miller Light ads in the early 1980s were everywhere, and while I was far too young to drink the product, Bob made me laugh. “I must be in the front row” is something I always say when I go to sporting events. His role as Harry Doyle in “Major League” and its sequel delighted me as a kid, and now my own son quotes him. My son says “juuust a bit outside” on any bad pitch. After a particularly bad Reds outing this season, I said to my wife “two goddamn hits, hell no one’s listening”. I did not really watch Mr. Belvedere, but I had a close childhood friend reach out today and say that Bob Uecker on that show is the dad he always wanted. Later in life I discovered Bob’s legendary visits on Johnny Carson, and I love to tell the story of Uecker and Bob Gibson holding hands in the Cardinals team photo. Bob was a Gen X/Millennial comic legend.

I was lucky enough to meet Bob Uecker one time. Back in 2005 I was working in Milwaukee. I was at an event where Bob was the guest speaker. He took time to talk to each person and he was as funny as he always was. When I had my time with him I mentioned that I was from St. Louis. He asked my age and I told him I was young enough to not be around for his playing days but old enough to appreciate his after baseball work. He then said to me that I looked old enough to drink Miller Light but young enough to strike him out. I laughed and said thanks for the compliment. Immediately after my remark, Bob turned around and said it was no compliment to me but the truth of his abysmal hitting. His comic timing was perfect, and Bob Uecker gave me a memory for a lifetime.

I loved Bob Uecker. I already miss him. The world was a much better place with Mr. Baseball bringing us joy. Bob’s last call ever, a Brewer’s playoff loss to the Mets, the legend said at the end of the game “I’m telling you. That one (pause) had some sting on it”. Bob Uecker always knew what to say.

Thank you for a life well lived, thank you for the memories, and thank you for decades of entertaining this boy from St. Louis, but today (pause) has some sting on it.

RD

RD is the creator and Head Editor of SeedSing. He also does a bunch of podcasts. Find them here.

Support SeedSing by joining our Patreon

Ty Watches "Kinds of Kindness

After over three days of viewing it, I just finished Yorgos Lanthinmos' latest movie, "Kinds of Kindness". This is a movie I was looking forward to after watching "Poor Things" and falling in love with it instantly. I also happen to be a Lanthimos fan. I like "The Favourite", "The Lobster" is one of the most underrated movies, and as I previously mentioned, "Poor Things" was amazing. I was going into "Kinds of Kindness" with high hopes. The cast was also pretty stellar. Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons, Hong Chau, Willem Dafoe, Margaret Qualley are all in this movie and I enjoy most of their work.

With all that being said, with all the expectations, this was one of the weirder movies I've seen in a long, long time. That doesn't mean I disliked the movie. I enjoy weird movies. I like movies that sit with you after you see them. I want a movie to challenge me from time to time. I want to go back and read multiple things about some of these movies to see what I may have missed. "Kinds of Kindness" gave me all of that.

The movie also frustrated me too. And that's fine. I think what frustrated me most, outside of the 164 minute runtime, was how disjointed the finished product was. This is a movie told in three parts, with three different stories and the actors playing multiple roles. That's all well and good, but I almost wished Lanthimos just decided to make three shorts. Or he could have chopped this up into one two hour long very good idea of a movie. The movie is also unexpectedly gory and sexual. There are some things in this movie that made me uncomfortable to watch. I'm becoming more squeamish the older I get, but some stuff in here felt a little gratuitous. There's a lot to ingest with each story and it comes at you in shocking and wild ways.

Outside those few complaints I had, this is an okay movie. Plemons is doing a masterclass here. His performances in the three different stories are pretty damn great. When he is given solid material and doesn't always have to play a creep, he can do some good things. I especially loved his performance in the second story. It's quite clear that Emma Stone trusts and respects Lanthimos and he seems to bring out some of her best work. The third story, which follows a cult and its members, is where Stone really buys in and pulls out all the stops. She is tremendous there. Dafoe and Chau don't have as much screen time as Plemmons and Stone, but when they're on screen they're great. Qualley is in and out of the first two stories, but she pulls double duty in the third one, and she goes toe to toe with Stone. The movie is, while still very odd, very thought provoking. I was getting a little sleepy eyed with about 40 minutes left, but then some stuff started to happen which jarred me awake. I had to see what was going to happen next. The movie kept my attention better than others. I also appreciate the fact that Lanthimos went a little sci-fi with the second story. I understand that "Poor Things" is about reanimation, which is very sci-fi, but in this movie, which is a hard drama, he adds a little sci-fi spice and I like that. I like when people take chances.

All in all, "Kinds of Kindness" is a good movie. It has all the tools to be good. Hell, it has everything it needs to be great. But, it is incredibly weird. The movie is niche. It can be shocking here and there. It has unsettling things happening left and right. I will most likely never watch the movie again. But, I'm glad I was able to see it, finish it and write about it today. I don't know if I'd recommend it to everyone though. If you do watch it, what I will say, expect the unexpected. And go in with an open mind. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Better Late than Never on "Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror"

On the heels of seeing Robert Eggers “Nosferatu”, I decided I needed to go back and watch the original from 1922. That one is called “Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror”.

Now, going into this movie, I knew next to nothing about it. I knew Eggers based his movie on this story and that he used elements and images from the original. I should also mention that my dad told me to watch it as well. He remembered liking it, and his opinion hold a ton of brevity for me.

As I settled into this movie, I didn’t realize what a treat I’d be in for. “Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror” is a very good movie. I didn’t know it was a silent movie, my first, but that didn’t matter. This movie is scary. I found myself jumping here and there while watching. The actors are so good with their body movements and facial expressions that it’s easy to get context from all of that. There’s also cards that flash that help guide you along the story. The cards have written words on them and they tell anyone who may not know what is going on. Eggers did use the same character names. Ellen and Thomas Hutter are the main characters. These old time actors are great. They do so much without saying a single word. Ellen Hutter is exceptional. She has a lot to do and she nails it. Knock is creepier in the original. He’s small and squirrelly. He’s menacing. He has an odd mouth shape and the actor used it well. The seamen and doctors have the perfect look. But this is truly all about the actor playing Count Orlok. This is the original on film vampire. This guy is creepy as hell. His whole aura had me scared. From his hair to his teeth to his fingers, it’s all a great vampire look. He also makes some great facial expressions and really goes for it. Watching him float in and out of scenes was wild. Seeing him carrying a coffin was nuts.

This was so worth going back to see where this idea all started. There’s a real reason why this is considered one of the great scary movies. The music and tone are perfect. The actors are great. The scenery is eerie and well used. It’s an achievement when you realize this movie is over 100 years old. I cannot get over how much I liked this movie. I’m not the biggest fan of older movies, but this one has made me rethink that and now I want to go back and watch some more. If you like Eggers “Nosferatu”, go watch “Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror”. You’ll love it ad much as I did. I also recommend seeing it anyway because it’s pretty damn good.

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.